XMAN autosetup.
Observe the safeguards.
Security should be a deployment property, not a final-minute instruction for an agent. Experience an edited excerpt of XMAN's setup flow, then inspect the architecture, policy decisions, and operational limits.
Proof needs a workflow—not a promise.
From the actual XMAN autosetup recording, we recreated the key stages in a legible, privacy-safe clip: permission choices, network warnings, discovery, isolation planning, safe maintenance and private recovery. The original recording is not published.
Editorial reconstruction based on supplied footage. No raw terminal frame, machine name, token, path, key or private identifier is distributed. Not a verification of completed enforcement.
Not a new sandbox for the sake of a new sandbox.
OpenClaw
OpenClaw already supports sandboxing and security audits. Its own documentation describes one trusted operator boundary per gateway; mixed-trust deployments require deliberate separation.
Read the official security model ↗OpenShell + NemoClaw
NVIDIA's tooling implements real network, filesystem, process and inference enforcement. This is substantial existing security technology that Clawsolator may integrate, not pretend to supersede.
Review enforcement layers ↗Clawsolator + XMAN
Our product direction connects isolated agent execution with easier lifecycle management, guided setup, bounded resource requests, operator approvals, recovery and multiple business domains. Integration does not remove the need for independent testing.
See the setup walkthrough →Operator review is visible. Outcome claims remain testable.
The supplied footage demonstrates permission prompts, maintenance planning, isolation workflows, and private recovery-copy work. It does not independently prove that every attack vector is prevented, that privileged execution has shipped, or that this workflow is certified for enterprise compliance.